Moake Park Group × Fort AI Agency

AI Construction Document QC

Cross-references your specification manual against the drawing set and surfaces every mismatch — equipment specified but not shown, fixtures shown but not specified, finish callouts that contradict the schedule, fixture counts that don’t match submittal quantities. Each finding is page-cited on both sides so a reviewer can audit it in under a minute.

Pilot: Duneland Family YMCA — Chesterton, IN6 disciplines · 1,542-page spec manualEngine: Live

What the engine flags

Equipment specified, not shown

Spec calls out a piece of equipment, drawings don't show it on any sheet. The most common QAQC catch — and the most expensive to miss after bid.

Drawn but not specified

Fixture appears on a plan or schedule but the spec doesn't define it. Submittals will get rejected; field installs the wrong product.

Quantity mismatch

Spec says 12 toilets, drawings show 14. Bid quantities and submittal counts get caught before they hit the contractor.

Finish callout conflicts

Room finish schedule says VCT, plan tag shows carpet. Coordinate before bidding to avoid change orders.

How it works

  1. 1

    Ingest

    Upload the spec manual and all discipline CD sets. The system splits, OCR-checks, and indexes by CSI division + section.

  2. 2

    Extract

    Per CSI section, the engine builds a structured catalog of every spec'd item — equipment, fixtures, materials, finishes — with verbatim evidence quotes and absolute page references. Drawings get parsed for schedule tables, plan callouts, and sheet indexes.

  3. 3

    Reconcile

    Spec items and drawing items are cross-referenced using model numbers, tag marks (P-1, AHU-1, WC-1), descriptions, and room locations. Every mismatch is flagged with severity, confidence, and two-sided evidence.

  4. 4

    Review

    Output is a structured QC report — each finding has the spec page + sheet number, verbatim quotes, and a recommended next action. A reviewer can audit each flag in under 60 seconds.

Accuracy is the whole point

QC tooling only earns trust if every finding is auditable. The architecture is built so each flag carries everything a reviewer needs to verify or dismiss it in one screen.